In a stunning turn of events, Congresswoman Karoline Leavitt has accused First Lady Jill Biden of forgery, igniting a constitutional crisis that could alter the trajectory of the Biden presidency. During a high-stakes hearing, Leavitt presented damning evidence suggesting that Jill Biden had been signing official presidential documents on behalf of her husband, President Joe Biden, while he was reportedly incapacitated. The room fell silent when Leavitt confronted Jill Biden with a specific executive order bearing her signature, demanding to know if she had ever signed federal documents for the president.

Jill Biden’s response was chilling: “Only when he asked me to.” This admission raised alarm bells across the chamber, as it revealed that the First Lady had been executing presidential authority in situations where her husband was unable to do so due to health concerns. Leavitt pressed further, questioning the legality and transparency of such actions, which could have far-reaching implications for the Biden administration and the very fabric of American democracy.

As the hearing unfolded, it became clear that Jill Biden’s actions had not only breached constitutional protocols but also set a dangerous precedent for future administrations. Multiple lawmakers expressed their discomfort, questioning whether the nation had unknowingly been governed by an “unofficial co-presidency.” The fallout was immediate; legal scholars and political analysts began calling for a special inquiry, as the implications of a First Lady stepping into such a role raised serious questions about power and accountability.

With the media in a frenzy, social media ablaze, and public outrage mounting, the integrity of the presidency hangs in the balance. As more details emerge, Congress is faced with a sobering reality: who is truly running the country? The nation waits with bated breath as the implications of this unfolding scandal reverberate through the corridors of power.