In a stunning courtroom showdown, a furious judge has delivered a scathing rebuke to Prince Harry, emphatically declaring, “You can’t use taxpayer money!” This explosive moment unfolded during a high-stakes hearing where Harry demanded that UK taxpayers fund his security, despite voluntarily stepping back from royal duties in 2020. The judge’s fierce rejection has sent shockwaves through the media and royal circles alike, igniting a fierce debate over the couple’s perceived entitlement to public funds.

The dramatic courtroom exchange highlighted Harry’s insistence—backed by the influence of Meghan Markle—that his status warrants state-funded protection during his visits to the UK. The judge, visibly frustrated, challenged the legitimacy of Harry’s request, questioning how someone who has renounced royal responsibilities could expect financial backing from the very citizens he distanced himself from. The gravity of the situation intensified with the judge’s pointed reminder of Harry’s lucrative deals with Netflix and Spotify, underscoring a growing perception of hypocrisy.

Royal insiders suggest Meghan’s role in pushing Harry to pursue this case is driven by a sense of principle. However, critics argue her motivations are far from altruistic, pointing out a troubling pattern of controversy and legal battles surrounding the couple since their exit from royal life. The courtroom drama echoes the couple’s ongoing struggle to balance their royal legacy with their new life in California, as they continue to invoke their titles while simultaneously rejecting royal obligations.

This latest clash has reignited public scrutiny over the privileges of non-working royals, and as the judge’s verdict reverberates, it serves as a stark reminder that stepping away from the crown comes with a cost. The message is unmistakable: if you leave the monarchy, you must also relinquish its perks.