In a shocking twist in the ongoing political drama, Democrats are launching a fierce counterattack in response to allegations surrounding President Biden’s use of an autopen for signing pardons. The controversy erupted after it was revealed that Biden may not have been fully aware of who was receiving clemency, raising serious questions about the integrity of his administration.

James Comr, the leading investigator into the autopen scandal, has come under fire for his own use of digital signatures in official correspondence. Critics argue that this undermines the legitimacy of Biden’s actions, with Comr himself admitting to using Adobe Acrobat for some letters. However, Comr vehemently defends his practices, asserting that legally binding subpoenas always bear a wet signature, contrasting his actions with the alleged misuse of the autopen in the White House.

As the New York Times reported, Biden has openly acknowledged his limited knowledge of the pardons being granted, stating he delegated crucial decisions to aides. This admission has sparked outrage among Republicans, who are now questioning the validity of over 12,000 acts of clemency issued during Biden’s presidency. Comr’s response to the backlash has been swift, pointing out that the comparison between his digital signatures and Biden’s autopen usage is misleading and absurd.

The implications of this scandal are enormous, with calls for greater accountability and transparency in the presidential pardon process. Critics are demanding a reevaluation of the autopen’s role in executive actions, fearing that it compromises the very essence of presidential authority. As investigations continue, the political landscape remains tense, with both parties bracing for the fallout from this explosive revelation. The stakes have never been higher, and the American public is left wondering: who truly holds the power in the White House?