In a stunning legal blow to Donald Trump, Judge Garfey has ruled in favor of Bob Woodward and Simon & Schuster, dismissing Trump’s claims over the lucrative “Trump Tapes.” This pivotal decision marks a significant victory for journalism and copyright law, as it decisively rejects Trump’s assertions of co-authorship over the audio interviews that were sold for a staggering $50 million.

The ruling comes after Trump filed a lawsuit in Pensacola, Florida, which was later transferred to New York, where it was assigned to Judge Garfey—known for his meticulous but often slow judicial process. In an 81-page order, Garfey dismantled Trump’s arguments, emphasizing that Trump had no legal basis to claim joint ownership of the tapes. Despite Trump’s claims of being a co-author, the judge underscored that copyright law favors the party who “fixes” the work in a permanent medium, which in this case was Woodward and Simon & Schuster.

Garfey’s ruling noted that Trump failed to provide sufficient facts to support his copyright claims, effectively rendering his lawsuit futile. The judge’s decision not only reinforces the integrity of journalistic endeavors but also serves as a stark reminder of the limitations of Trump’s legal maneuvers.

As the legal saga continues, Trump has until August 18, 2025, to amend his complaint, but the path forward appears grim. This landmark ruling is not just a setback for Trump; it is a clarion call for the protection of journalistic integrity in an era where media outlets face increasing pressure from powerful figures. The ramifications of this case will undoubtedly echo through the corridors of power, as it highlights the critical need for unwavering support for the First Amendment and the rights of journalists to report without fear of retribution.