In the world of football, few names evoke as much passion and debate as Diego Maradona and Cristiano Ronaldo. Both titans of the sport not only dazzled fans with their s𝓀𝒾𝓁𝓁s but also amassed considerable wealth throughout their careers. A recent analysis compares their luxurious lifestyles, revealing fascinating insights into who truly lives the lavish life.

When it comes to watch collections, Ronaldo takes the crown with an impressive array of timepieces, including a $12 million Bugatti Centodieci and a number of Rolexes worth hundreds of thousands. Maradona, while also a connoisseur, showcased a more modest collection, highlighted by his $224,000 Hublot King Power Rose Gold.

In real estate, Ronaldo again shines with his $21 million mansion in Portugal, which boasts five suites and a sprawling outdoor area. Maradona’s properties, including a $12 million mansion in Dubai, reflect opulence but fall short of Ronaldo’s extensive holdings.

The cars are another arena where Ronaldo outpaces Maradona. His garage features a Bugatti Veyron valued at around $2.5 million, while Maradona’s collection, although impressive with models like the Ferrari F40, does not match the sheer value of Ronaldo’s vehicles.

Traveling in style is essential for both stars. Ronaldo’s yacht, estimated at $10 million, and his Gulfstream G650 jet, worth up to $70 million, exemplify his commitment to luxury. Maradona favored speedboats and jets, but they do not rival the scale of Ronaldo’s transportation.

In terms of net worth, Ronaldo’s financial prowess shines through, with estimates placing his fortune at over $600 million, significantly higher than Maradona’s estimated $50 million. Ronaldo’s ventures, including his CR7 brand and hotel partnerships, have solidified his status as a savvy businessman.

While Maradona remains a cherished figure in football history, Ronaldo’s lifestyle, property holdings, and financial acumen ultimately lead to a decisive victory in this lifestyle battle. The comparison underscores not only their achievements on the field but also their distinct approaches to life off it.