**Supreme Court SMACKS DOWN Rogue Judges Blocking Trump**

In a landmark ruling today, the Supreme Court decisively overturned a series of controversial lower court injunctions that had blocked former President Trump’s executive order on 𝐛𝐢𝐫𝐭𝐡right citizenship, marking a significant victory for the administration. The 6-3 decision, delivered by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, challenges the growing trend of federal judges issuing universal injunctions that halt government policies across the nation.

The Court’s ruling comes amid rising tensions over judicial overreach, as it condemned the practice of allowing a single district judge to impose nationwide injunctions, effectively wielding power akin to that of Congress. Justice Barrett emphasized that such actions exceed the authority granted to federal courts under the Judiciary Act of 1789, stating, “The complete relief principle operates as a ceiling on the authority.”

Justice Kagan, in dissent, warned that this ruling risks creating a “zone of lawlessness,” enabling the executive branch to act without accountability. She argued that the judiciary’s role is to ensure that the law is upheld universally, not just for the parties involved in a case. Yet, the majority opinion underscored that the courts must remain within their constitutional limits, rejecting the notion that one judge could dictate policy for the entire country.

The Supreme Court’s decision is poised to reshape the landscape of executive power and judicial authority, as it reaffirms the principle that federal courts can only issue relief that directly benefits the plaintiffs in a case. This ruling is a clarion call against judicial activism, reaffirming that the judiciary must not overstep its bounds.

As the ramifications of this ruling unfold, it signals a new chapter in the ongoing battle over immigration policy and executive authority, with Trump’s administration now empowered to implement its controversial policies without obstruction from rogue judges. The stakes have never been higher as the judiciary grapples with its role in a polarized political landscape.